Monday, December 7, 2009

The National Board For Blog Control Would Sue This!

A few days back, I stumbled upon this interesting headline in the papers “SC: Scrabble is a game, not a puzzle”. Baffled and bemused in equal parts, I went on to read further and discovered that the Supreme Court judges had spent a good deal of time studying the history and development of Scrabble (and presumably also played a good deal of games) before concluding that Scrabble could not be classified as a puzzle and instead was a game. They went on to list differences between Scrabble and Crossword puzzles to prove beyond doubt that Scrabble was indeed a game. Now you might wonder “It’s been 25 years since the Bhopal Gas Tragedy and the perpetrators have still not been brought to justice, so what on Earth is the Supreme Court doing wasting precious time on the taxonomy of Scrabble?” But there you have it – being a Supreme Court judge does not simply involve wearing a funny wig and presiding over judgments that change the course of a nation – you also get to play a lot of Scrabble.

And then it dawned on me – there are a lot of people with important-sounding titles all over the place, who really don’t do anything much. Take, for example, the National Egg Coordination Committee. Now, I’m not saying they don’t do anything at all, and they must be quite busy putting out all those “Roz Khao Ande” ads; but I’m pretty sure the NECC employees don’t come home dead tired at 10 in the night saying “Honey, don’t disturb me today – I’ve been working really hard coordinating eggs all day.”

And I bet you didn’t know that the Indian Government has a Ministry for Non-Resident Indians as well as a Ministry for Overseas Indians! I suppose both the ministries are perpetually at loggerheads over what falls under their purview, which is probably the only way to keep them occupied. The second of these ministries was probably created just to stop some politician from defecting to a rival party, is what I would guess. Here are some of the more obscure government departments that you probably didn’t know your tax-money was supporting:

  • National Centre for Jute Diversification
  • Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan
  • National Balbhavan
  • National Centre for Promotion of Urdu Language
  • National Remote Sensing Agency
  • National Mission for Manuscripts
  • National Frequency Allocation Planning Board

And this is not just limited to the government. Take scientific research, for example – sounds like a perfectly serious and responsible profession, doesn’t it? Yet every second day, solemn scientists with top degrees and impeccable credentials make the news for research that would not exactly make you go “Oh my god! Is that really so?” If you ever turn to that section of the newspapers that talk about the latest developments/findings on the health/lifestyle front, these are the kind of reports you’re likely to see:

Men Likely to Stare at Women in Skimpy Clothes

Researchers at the Department of Anthropology, University of Bath, England, have concluded that there is a 94.6% higher chance that men would stare at a woman dressed in skimpy attire as opposed to a woman wearing a brown paper bag over her head. This was the result of a research conducted across 12000 men all over the world over a five-year period. According to eminent anthropologist Dr Ludwig Van Ecclestone, who headed the research, “Men tend to suffer from what we in the research circles refer to as the ambulatory optic syndrome, something that lay men would call a roving eye. The minute a scantily-clad woman walks in to a room, most men’s eyes would immediately dart in her direction to catch a quick glimpse. This explains a lot and we hope this study contributes to a greater understanding of the cross-gender interaction in a socio-environmental context.”

Humans Need Privacy

In a groundbreaking research that was conducted across 25 different species that included humans, insects, birds, mammals, reptiles and Paris Hilton, it was discovered that humans needed privacy more than all other species, except bears during hibernation. “The human need for privacy is indeed a very strong one, which is why there are so many houses that have been built all over the world. Not just houses, our research has helped explain other phenomena of human civilization such as curtains, doors, and why Russell Crowe is regularly in the news for beating up a pesky paparazzi photographer”, says Dr Ricard Ecschnede, Director, Psychiatry Studies Wing, University of San Diego.

Three Bottles of Beer a Day is Good for Health

Well, its official – beer is good for your health. At least until the next such study is conducted. Researchers at the Oktoberfest University of Health Studies in Munich have concluded that having three bottles of beer after work every day generally keeps your bodily functions as well as mental faculties going and can lead to a longer life expectancy. This contradicts the earlier study that stated that consumption of beer was injurious to health, which itself was a direct contradiction of the previous study that said that beer had a lot of beneficial effects on the human health.

And I’m not kidding about any of all this – you might think that I made up all the stuff mentioned above, which may be partly true when it comes to the finer details, but the essence of it is pretty much the same. If you don’t believe me, I quote below the headlines from yesterday’s newspaper on the kind of research that’s been happening:

“US docs relocate fat to create bigger breasts”

“Tomato and potato plants are carnivores”

“All men watch harmless porn”

So remember – the next time you meet some official-looking person who hands you his business card and it says “Vice President, Documentation”, he could very well turn out to be the office photocopying boy! (as one of my professors at GIM had put it)

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

To Do or Not To Do?

After the spectacular failure of condoms as contraceptives, the government has decided to opt for more drastic measures to confront one of the biggest challenges facing our country - overpopulation. Recently, Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad announced something along the lines of “The best way to control the population is by having a TV set in every house in every village. Witty and engaging late-night television programming is the only way to ensure that people do not spend all their free-time having sexual intercourse and procreating.”

Now, a lot of you might be wondering why condoms have ended up being such a spectacular failure, what with the government doing its utmost to promote their use – they created embarrassing ad campaigns and condom ringtones to generate awareness, they distributed condoms across the country, they enabled easy access to information about condoms, they installed vending machines at public places, they spread awareness of sexually transmitted diseases, they created catchy slogans for family planning, etc.

The problem is that people will not listen to anything that the government tells them to do. Most people will go to great lengths to do something that is dangerous and frowned upon by the authorities, but might not care much about it the minute it is approved and/or encouraged by the authorities. Take pornography and drugs, for example. Condoms probably had a perfectly decent shot at being a successful contraceptive until the government decided to step in and promote its use. Perhaps the best way to encourage people to use condoms would be to ban them.

This would result in a huge underground market for condoms, and people would go to great lengths to get hold of condoms. Youths across the country would be planning their Saturday-night escapades, “Let’s get really wild today – we’ll get pissed drunk, smoke up and then use condoms while having sex!” Condom dealers would replace drug dealers as the coolest people around town; although the downside would be that the condom mafia might pose all sorts or strange law and order problems – “Four Killed in Gang Warfare between Ribbed and Extra-Lubricated Condom Gangs” or “Textured Condoms Kingpin Arrested in Raid – Six Cartons of Dotted and Flavoured Condoms Seized”

But I guess the government had had enough of condoms, and decided that “If condoms have not succeeded as contraceptives, then by God we’ll find something that will!” As is usually the case with the government when choosing something, tenders were invited from various different pastimes/activities to pitch for the position of “Official Contraceptive of India”.

Predictably, the government was swamped with responses from all sorts of entities pitching themselves as the ideal fit for India’s next contraceptive - whether it was sports, television, movies, surgical procedures or Paris Hilton. Below is a sample of the responses that have been obtained from the inbox of the Ministry of Health:

From: Chocolate [mailto:chocolate@aphrodisiacs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:21 AM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

Dear Government

Since time immemorial, chocolate has been effectively utilized to enhance one’s appetite for sexual activities. Whether it was the Egyptian Civilization, the Indus Valley Civilization or the Flintstones, there is enough evidence to suggest that Chocolates have played a major role in boosting the sex-drives of humans throughout history. Even today, most cultures accept chocolate as one of the foremost aphrodisiacs...WAIT A SECOND!!! OH, SORRY...YOU’RE LOOKING FOR CONTRACEPTIVES! UMM...JUST IGNORE THIS MAIL. DELETE IT FROM YOUR INBOX. Sorry for the confusion, this is so embarrassing.

Warm Regards

Chocolate

From: Religion [mailto:religion@rubbishconcepts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:35 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

Dear Government

While it makes absolutely no sense for people to stop having sex, history has revealed that there is only one way to get people to do something that makes absolutely no sense – Religion.

Therefore, we believe that the answer to India’s new contraceptive can only be religion – we’ll tell people that it’s against their religion to have sex.

Thanks and regards

Religion

From: BCCI [mailto:BCCI@humoungousprofits.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:15 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

Dear Government

Over the years, Cricket has emerged as India’s favourite pastime. The entire nation is hooked to cricket when the Indian team is playing – therefore we sincerely believe that the best way to stop people from having sex is to get the Indian team to play cricket every night.

Truly,

Board of Control for Cricket in India

PS – This has nothing to do with us wanting to make more money – do NOT listen to our detractors who’ll tell you that the BCCI is nothing but a greedy, money-spinning organization.

From: Work [mailto:work@takethefunoutoflife.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:08 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

dear govt

spectacularly successful in a lot of countries across the world (refer attachment), longer and more stressful working hours have resulted in people having sex less frequently with their partners. plus it has the added advantage of raising the country’s national output – hence we believe that work is the most effective and safe form of contraception now that condoms have failed.

rgds

wrk

From: Banking Industry [mailto:banks@thedoldrums.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:45 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

We don’t know how or what we’d do as contraceptives, BUT WE REALLY COULD USE THE BUSINESS, what with the recession and all.

From: Chocolate [mailto:chocolate@betterthansex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:15 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Proposal – Official Contraceptive for India

Dear Government

Statistics reveal that sex is one of the most primal and pleasurable activities known to man. Now, a lot of people might suggest different ways to get people to stop having sex - sports, household chores, long hours in the office, joining the army, looking at nude pictures of Paris Hilton, etc. But I ask you this – are any of these MORE enjoyable than sex? The answer, dear government, is that they’re not.

So how do you get people to stop having sex then? Innumerable surveys have revealed that there is only one thing women enjoy more than sex – CHOCOLATES!

This is why you need look no further than Chocolates when looking for a new contraceptive.

Sincerely,

Chocolate

Just as the government was finalizing on Chocolates, along came the winning pitch, the one that instantly convinced the government on whom to go with for the “Official Contraceptive of India”:

From: Television [mailto:tv@thenextcondom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:12 PM
To: Ministry of Health [mailto:healthmin@indiangov.in]
Cc: Department of Population Control [mailto:contraceptives4u@indiangov.healthmin.in]
Subject: Pitch – Official Contraceptive for India

Dear Government

“I suppose all my competitors would be saying a lot of things and giving a lot of reasons as to why they should be made the next contraceptive. I just have this to say:

According to research conducted in Italy, people with TV in their homes had 40% lesser sex than those without TV in their homes. And this is ITALIAN WOMEN we’re talking about!!!”

Regards

TV

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

This Blog Can Change Your Life!

There are two kinds of books in this world (and I’m not talking about textbooks here): books that are interesting to read and don’t teach you anything, and books that try to try to teach you something and ought to be burnt. Business/management books happen to fall squarely in the second category, along with self-help books, motivational books and anything ever written by Deepak Chopra.

Business books first started when people (probably MBAs) with a lot of time on their hands decided that MBAs should not have so much free time on their hands. The truth is that MBAs hardly learn anything during their two-year course. If you don’t believe me, ask any MBA what they learnt in B-School, and they would look lost for a good few minutes before sheepishly telling you something vague about how being in a B-School changed their mindset and made them more confident even when they have no clue what they’re talking about. But no one would ever be able to tell you something specific that they learnt, like the Second Law of Thermodynamics. To plug this gap, B-School students were forced to read business books with the false claim that they contain learnings essential for any aspiring manager.

After having read precisely two business books, I am thoroughly convinced that the entire business book industry is a big hoax. The biggest problem with Business books is that...well, they don’t really deserve to be books. Most of these are books that can be summarised in ONE SENTENCE!

For instance, I happened to read one such business book, called “Who Moved My Cheese?” While the title may hint at a boring in-depth analysis of the dairy-farming industry, the book is actually an infinitely more boring allegorical tale about people needing to adapt to changing circumstances instead of moping about and clinging to the past. The author goes on and on rambling about how this one mouse went into a heightened state of depression when the cheese in his regular place went mysteriously missing and refused to go looking about for more cheese. The other mouse, on the other hand, goes looking for new cheese, all the while scribbling profound quotes on the wall on what he’s learnt for the day (don’t ask me why!):

“The Quicker You Let Go Of Old Cheese, The Sooner You Find New Cheese”, “Old Beliefs Do Not Lead You To New Cheese” and “Movement in a New Direction Helps You Find New Cheese”.

For a mouse hung up on change, it’s ironic that he doesn’t realize he's writing the exact same message over and over again in a slightly different way. Predictably, this mouse finally manages to get a new mountain of cheese after going through the usual series of struggles and hardships where he feels down and out and as if it’s a hopeless cause. The first mouse, equally predictably, finally dies of hunger, or realises the error of his ways...I cannot exactly remember. But the underlying point of the book is that if you don’t adapt to change, you starve.

Now, I’m not suggesting that no-one ever learnt anything from the book. I’m sure there are a large number of people whose lives changed dramatically after reading this book and who went on to have super-successful careers attending meetings and pocketing bonuses. All I’m saying is that, like cigarette packs, there should at least be some sort of a warning or disclaimer to alert one that this book could be a monumental waste of time for anyone whose intellectual depth exceeds that of an earthworm. The publishers and the author should come right out and state that:

DISCLAIMER: IF YOU’RE THE TYPE OF PERSON WHO FEELS THAT READING ABOUT THE SAME IDEA FOR ABOUT A HUNDRED-ODD PAGES NARRATED TO YOU IN A VERY CHILDLIKE AND SIMPLE MANNER WOULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE DRAMATICALLY THEN GO AHEAD AND READ THIS BOOK. ELSE THE MESSAGE BELOW WILL SUFFICE.

“Dear Reader

When stuff around you changes, you need to adapt to succeed; otherwise you’ll be left behind while others rake in the dough.

Come to think of it, Darwin had said something along these lines when he talked about Survival of the Fittest, so this isn’t even anything new. I don’t even know why I’m writing a whole book on this. Forget I ever brought it up.

Regards

Dr. Spencer Johnson, MD”

Or take the other business book that I’d been forced to read, Execution: the Discipline of Getting Things Done. Written by a big-time former-CEO chap called Larry Bossidy, he painstakingly rambles on for three-hundred odd pages about the same idea, filling the book up with examples of his visits to various offices and plants and using top-management-y sounding words like paradigm, adaptability, actionable, incentivize, leverage, etc.

It would’ve saved everyone so much time and effort if the publishers had just stated upfront:

DISCLAIMER: THIS BOOK CONTAINS AN ENDLESS REPETITION OF ONE CENTRAL IDEA SIMPLY BECAUSE BIG-TIME CEO LARRY BOSSIDY HAS NOW RETIRED AND IS NO LONGER DRAWING THAT SIX-FIGURE SALARY SO HE THOUGHT WRITING THIS BOOK WOULD HELP GET HIM ONE LAST BIG PAYCHECK. IF YOU’RE THE TYPE TO LAP UP ANYTHING EVER TOLD BY A BIG-TIME CEO AND BE INSPIRED BY IT THEN BY ALL MEANS PURCHASE THIS BOOK. ELSE THE MESSAGE BELOW SHOULD SUFFICE.

“Dear Reader

Even though I’m a big-time business leader who spends all his time jet-setting to far-flung plants and attending strategic meetings, all that amounts to nothing unless you see to it that the plans you make are implemented.

Many of you might think that’s a pretty obvious thing to say, but I’m a big-time CEO and have a lot of real-life examples to prove my point, so I thought I’d write an entire book on this.

Sincerely,

Larry Bossidy”

For some of these books, the title itself gives away the fact that it does not deserve to be a book. Take “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” – you would think it should’ve just been one paragraph with seven bullet points; yet the author manages to stretch it to an entire book! As if that wasn’t enough, the sequel to that book (The Eighth Habit of Highly Successful People) talks about only ONE habit! Although I haven’t read the book, I’m willing to bet that the eighth habit would be something that Stephen Covey learnt after his previous book:

Habit # 8 – “Write a self-help book with a simple yet purposeful/life-changing-sounding title such as ‘Seven Habits...’, ‘You Can Win’, ‘How to Win Friends and Influence People’, etc”!

Friday, July 10, 2009

Doesn't Quite Ad Up, Does it?

It’s a strange sort of effect that advertisements can have on you: you either feel that you don’t belong to this planet, or that the people who create the ads are from another planet. Take, for example, the latest ad campaign from Idea Cellular, “Walk and Talk”. A lot of people walk while they’re talking on their phones, but I think just about everyone would agree that they don’t see this as the route to a healthy lifestyle. I mean, you’d definitely never come across a conversation such as this on planet earth:

You: Good Lord, look at you! I would never have recognized you! You looked like a blue whale the last time we met; your physique stretched across time-zones! And now you’re thinner than graph paper! Wow – whatever happened? Did you stop eating altogether? Underwent a gruelling weight-loss regime? Were you run over by a road-roller?

Ex Blue-Whale Lookalike: Nonsense, nothing of that sort. I just spoke a lot on my cell phone – it’s the Idea network, you see!

Or if you take a look at any of the hair gel ads, you might wonder why anyone really needs an ad agency – all you need to do is just get hold of a hot girl and a guy who applies so much gel that it looks like he has a wet porcupine on his head. Well, to be honest, this is exactly what an ad agency does, but only in case the ad budget is really low. If the ad budget is higher, then the ad agency is automatically expected to do something extra. So the ad agency scouts around all over the world, finds a suitably exotic foreign location, and then gets hold of a hot girl and a guy who applies so much gel that it looks like he has a wet porcupine on his head.

Now a lot of ad agency professionals might object to the previous paragraph as demeaning to their profession, and I have to agree that they’re absolutely correct. Not all ad agencies blindly get hold of a hot girl and a guy who applies so much gel that it looks like he has a wet porcupine on his head. Many of them undertake a thorough branding exercise where they study the market and the consumers, define the target audience, create a differentiated brand proposition for the product, test these propositions with the consumers, and THEN get hold of a hot girl and a guy who applies so much gel that it looks like he has a wet porcupine on his head. In addition, many of them get hold of a hot girl and a guy who applies deodorant, and create a deo ad out of it. Or they get hold of a hot girl and a guy who rides a bike and create a bike ad out of it. The point I’m trying to make is that a lot of thought has clearly gone into it, and we should not be dismissive of such advertisements.

What would be interesting, though, is if there were ads for concepts or ideas instead of products and companies. This is what some of them could be like:

So what is the toughest thing to do on Earth? Understand women? Achieve world peace? Score lower than Paris Hilton on an IQ test? Resolve the Kashmir dispute?

Sure, all of these are incredibly tough things to do...but for the man who wants a real challenge, for the man who wishes to push himself beyond all limits of human endurance, there is only one answer – Differential Calculus!

Created by the all-time great, legendary mathematician Sir Isaac Newton, Differential Calculus is a technique using which you can solve complex mathematical equations by making it even more complex and incomprehensible!

Some of you might think that Differential Calculus is not exactly your cup of tea, but as any marketing guru will tell you these days: Differentiate or die!

DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS: DIFFERENTIATE OR DIE!

Which particle do you think plays the most important role in nuclear reactions?

Which particle do you think generates radioactive isotopes useful for a variety of purposes?

Yes, we’re sure you would’ve guessed protons or electrons. After all, they’re the ones with all the charge; they’re the ones who get all the attention. But you’re wrong!!! The answer, dear reader, is NEUTRONS!

So we’re not positively charged! Neither are we negatively charged! Big Deal! Goddamnit, there’s nothing wrong in being neutral. Neutrons today are being used in a wide variety of applications and research on neutrons is throwing up new uses every single day. Neutrons are the only particle to have a star named after them. So they next time you disparagingly dismiss neutrons as being fence-sitters, think again!

NEUTRONS: PROUD TO BE NEUTRAL

Jargon™ Inc

Blue-sky thinking, touch base, going forward, take this discussion offline, EOD, FYI, PFA, synergy, alignment, paradigm shift, etc. How many times have you heard management-types use these words? Indeed, Jargon has successfully established itself as the preferred language of the corporate world. The greater your command over this language, the higher you’re bound to climb up the corporate ladder!

Jargon™ Inc presents to you its new Crash Courses in Jargon™. In two weeks time, we’ll teach you to talk the corporate talk. Accidents shall turn into unintentional vehicular impacts, problems shall turn into challenging assignments, car owners shall turn into vehicularly empowered people and plain old you shall turn into corporate-ready you!

Join now, and avail of our special introductory offer of a free Jargon™ Handbook!

PUBLIC NOTICE

ISSUED IN PUBLIC INTEREST BY THE GOVT OF INDIA

Dear Citizens

This is your government speaking. Since independence, we have consistently been against alcohol and have insisted that it is bad for you. However, recent surveys indicate that alcohol, when consumed in moderation, actually reduces the risk of heart failure and prolongs your life span. Apparently, wine also contains antioxidants, which is one of the things that are damn good for your health these days.

To be very honest, we are very confused now and do not really know what stand to take regarding alcohol. In the meantime, we guess it’s perfectly fine if you’re drinking. Apologies for the last 60-odd years.

Sincerely,

Government

The last ad is one that I’d really love to see some day, but I guess the chances of that happening are about as high as Paris Hilton’s IQ. Finally, I’d like to propose a tagline for religion, which would ensure that, like movies and video games, religion is also among the list of activities considered harmful for impressionable young minds (although it's probably far more harmful, in my opinion):

Religion: Full of sects and violence!

Friday, July 3, 2009

The Art of Self-Defence

When we’re children, adults often fool us into doing things that are allegedly good for us and therefore we ought to do, like studying Geography. However, even as a child, I was not foolish enough to believe that karate was helpful for self-defence purposes. For some reason, though, most of the others seemed to believe this. One moment, karate was just this fighting style that you saw in obscure Chinese movies, the next moment every school and neighbourhood seemed to have karate classes for kids. One minute the neighbourhood parks were filled with kids playing cricket, the next minute the parks were filled with the same kids attending karate classes. Even in schools, instead of spending valuable time playing football or doing nothing, kids were forced into white gowns and colourful belts, made to squat in absurd positions and move their hands and feet while yelling all the time.

As a kid, it all just looked like too much effort for too little reward, but now that I think about it, the whole karate craze seems all the more ridiculous. I mean, think about it – have you EVER seen ANYBODY using karate for self-defence? The truth is that nobody uses karate, unless you’re in a Chinese movie. The way everybody seemed to be taking up karate at that stage, it seemed like there would be a new karate generation in the country. One would’ve thought that by the time we all grew up, people on the road would be engaging in karate fights whenever there was a scuffle due to a road accident.

Yet, as kids, karate was extolled to us as an excellent method for self-defence. The final outcome of a karate training course, however, was not kids who could defend themselves; rather they were kids who could put up an incredibly boring show to an equally disinterested audience consisting mostly of parents. The highlight of the show would be kids breaking wooden boards with their hands, or if they were really good, breaking bricks with their heads.

Think about it. As someone who’s pondering the merits of taking up karate, how would this sound for a conversation you have with a martial arts instructor:

You: So how exactly would this training help me?

Instructor: Well, you’d be able to break wooden boards or tiles with your own hands. Or if you’re really good, you could break bricks with your hands or even your head.

You: And that would help me because...?

Instructor: Ahhh...ummm...well, we’d also give you a succession of coloured belts to keep you motivated.

You: Really? Why didn’t you just say so earlier? Sign me up, I’m in!

Perhaps the only thing that karate is really useful for is the movies. If you ask the Chinese about kung-fu or karate, they would tell you that these are ancient Chinese martial arts techniques that require years of rigorous practice after which you can make terrible movies using only your hands and feet along with a lot of wooden furniture. For some reason most of these movies tend to have the word ‘Dragon’ as part of the name - such as Enter the Dragon, Curse of the Dragon, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, etc. This is how these movies are generally made:

  • The hero goes to some martial arts training school that is located on top of a forbidden-looking mountain, far far away from civilization. The school can only be reached by foot and even reaching there generally requires a level of effort comparable to Magellan circumnavigating the Earth.
  • On the first day, the hero, who is no slouch when it comes to martial arts and is pretty much the best exponent of it in his part of town, is utterly humiliated by the old master in a one-sided fight scene. The old master has a very long moustache and at some point in the past was the greatest warrior to have lived and had a ridiculous title such as The Grand Master Golden Samurai Ninja Turtle Warrior of the Great Empire. The hero realises that he has a lot to learn.
  • For 5-odd years, the hero undergoes a gruelling training where he is made to eat terrible food, sleep on cold stone floors and wear terrible clothes, mostly just a plain gown.
  • Then one fine day the hero is suddenly attacked by 4-5 excellent fighters. A long martial-art fight sequence ensues, filled with gravity-defying stunts and a lot of wooden furniture being broken. A bit like the Matrix, the assailants keep getting knocked down and you’d think they were dead, but they bounce back and keep the fight going on for long. However, the hero has now honed his fighting skills and finally is able to vanquish his assailants.
  • At this point The Grand Master Golden Samurai Ninja Turtle Warrior of the Great Empire appears out of the shadows and solemnly proclaims. “You have learnt well, Master X. After years and years of training, you are now ready to go out into the world and make some of the most terrible movies in the world using only your hands, feet and immense powers of concentration.”
(Note: This is a far cheaper approach than Hollywood, where they use a lot of expensive cars, explosives and Arnold Schwarzenegger to make some of the most terrible movies in the world).

I think most kids realised what a monumental waste of time karate had been by the time they grew into their teens. Which is when they decided to spend their valuable time playing pool instead; another craze that totally bypassed me for some reason – but I shall leave that topic for another day...

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

The Truth About Greek Gods

For all those girls who feel that comparing a guy to a Greek god is the best way of complimenting him, the truth is that it’s only a compliment in the way that calling Paris Hilton a good actress would be – it doesn’t mean anything. It so happens that I was doing some research on Greek gods (one of those oddball things that my work requires me to do sometimes) and a lot of myths I had about Greek gods have now been well and truly shattered (although to be honest it was always called Greek Mythology).

Myth # 1

Greek gods are powerful and majestic: Throughout childhood, one is exposed to majestic, beautiful Greek gods such as Apollo, Zeus, Venus and Aphrodite. This is not true – for every majestic, all-powerful Greek god such as Zeus (god of sky and thunder) and Apollo (god of music, archery, light and truth), there are dozens of mundane, everyday gods such as Hermes (god of thieves, commerce and travellers) and Alastor (god of family feuds).

Myth #2

Greek Gods have cool names: This is also not true. The sad truth is that there are hundreds of Greek gods with appalling names that you wouldn’t even try to pronounce such as Haphaestus and Eileithyia. We only end up knowing about the cool ones because their names have been usurped by all the brands; which is why we think that Greek gods have cool names when we are informed that Nike was the Greek goddess for sportswear.

Myth #3

Not everyone can just raise their hands one fine day and declare themselves a Greek god: This is the one aspect about Greek gods that came about as the biggest surprise to me. I always thought it was a big deal to be a Greek god; that the Greek gods comprised a bunch of exceptional, all-powerful beings that were truly worth worshipping. However, a quick look at some examples of Greek gods below will show you that it really doesn’t take much to be a Greek god:

Adephagia: Goddess of gluttony

Agdistis: Hermaphroditic demon

Alastor: God/demon of family feuds

Alectrona: Goddess of the morning or waking up

Ate: Goddess of foolish acts

Momus: God of satire and criticism

Notus: God of the south wind

Hygieia: Goddess of cleanliness

Eurus: God of the east wind

Ceto: Goddess of the dangers of the ocean and of sea monsters

Zephyrus: God of the west wind

Am I the only one who finds it a little odd that there is a goddess of foolish acts and a god of satire and criticism, or that separate gods are required for the directions in which the wind blows, or that one absolutely cannot manage without a deity as specific as the goddess of the dangers of the ocean and sea monsters? I’m pretty sure the first atheist was created due to this very reason. Imagine how tough it would have been for people in the navy, pirates or general explorers and seafarers in those days, when they decided to pray, “Bless me, O Poseidon, god of the sea; Amphitrite, goddess of the sea; Doris - goddess of the sea’s bounty; Ceto, goddess of the dangers of the ocean and of sea monsters; Brizo, goddess of sailors; Aeolus, god of the winds; Boreas, god of the north wind; Eurus, god of the east wind, Glaucus, minor sea god; Proteus, another minor sea god; Zephyrus, god of the west wind, and...ummm...you know what??? Screw you guys, I’m turning atheist!!!”

It’s a bit like the way ministries are formed in India, with every politician wrangling for a ministerial berth “Oh, you want a ministerial berth too, do you? Alright then, let’s see what we can come up with...aha! How about this one? Minister for Sociocultural Upkeep of Suburban India? Or this one – Minister for Closing Down Pubs & Discos, or better still, the Minister for Paleontological Studies of Hominids?”

And these names are just the tip of the iceberg – there are other, even more unspectacular gods such as Aristaeus (a good hunter and inventor), Charon (Hades’ ferryman), Enyalius (minor god of war) and Glaucus (minor sea god). I’m sure I could just walk in to the Greek gods’ annual conference, and if any of them notices an additional person and questions me, I could just cook up something like, “Oh, me! I’m the God of ummm...curtains and upholstery fabric! You know, fourth son of Minerva from her affair with Poseidon when he washed ashore the island of Crete. Nice to meet you.” Unless I said something especially daft like “I’m the god of human resources management”, I’m pretty certain of not getting thrown out of that conference.

And how about this one, Haphaestus – this is what his description has to say: God of fire and smiths with very weak legs. He makes armours for the gods and other heroes like Achilles. Son of Hera and Zeus is his father in some accounts. Married to Aphrodite, but she does not love him because of his weak legs and, as a result, is cheating on him with Ares. He had a daughter named Pandora. In a contemporary setting, this would translate as: “Bastard chap who is a poor athlete and manufactures defence equipment for a living. Is having marital issues; speculation is rife that this is due to non-performance in the sack because his legs cannot take it. Daughter responsible for bringing a lot of evil into this world.” The last statement might make you wonder if it’s Nehru they’re talking about, but would you read this profile and say “Hey, this sounds like a really swell guy! Let’s make him a God!”?

In fact, you could even try making up your own Greek god. I’d done this once, when I was asked to submit some names of Greek gods for a certain product, and slipped in Apropos among the usual list of Apollo, Eros, Adonis and the lot. Funnily enough the name Apropos was even short listed until someone higher up decided to be doubly sure and replied to me saying, “Check authenticity of Apropos as a Greek god. If yes, what is he the god of?”

So there you have it – Greek gods really aren’t all that they’re made out to be, they can have incredibly-tough-to-pronounce names, terribly redundant job descriptions (sounds a bit like a South Indian HR professional at this point, doesn’t it?) and you can even make one up without anyone noticing. Not quite the best compliment you’d want to give someone, is it?

Friday, May 29, 2009

His Holiness @ Facebook

In a fascinating bit of news, it seems that the Pope has decided to reach out to his followers by opening an account on Facebook. This sounds like yet another of those cases such as that uncool middle-aged uncle of yours who’s just bought a guitar and grown a ponytail to try and look cool. Sort of like the BSNL ads which give you the message “So what if I’m an incompetent, outdated government-owned telecom service provider? I know that hip-hop is the ‘in’ thing these days!” It would, however, be interesting to see the kind of posts the Pope would be receiving on his wall:

Pope’s Wall
Big trouble – Danish chap drew cartoons of Mohammed – Middle-East up in arms – conciliatory noises need to be made, maybe even a quick visit.
- Secretary

Bible Poker Night at Cardinal Monfils’ on Friday nite – bring your own holy wine.
- Cardinal Martinez XVIII

That whole Bethlehem mass business – big cock-up! Middle East up in arms – retraction might be in order, say you were misquoted, biblical language can be vague, all men are equal...that sort of stuff.
- Secretary

In a bit of a pickle here – was god really serious about the whole “Do not covet thy neighbour’s wife” bit? I’m sure he was on to something, but d’you suppose the old chap would relax the rules if the neighbour’s wife happened to be Carla Bruni?
- Gordon Brown, Prime Minister, England

That little speech of yours with the Byzantine emperor quote – big disaster! Middle East up in arms – say you were misquoted, or that you misquoted the emperor – or just say something insensitive and anti-gay to deflect attention from it.
- Secretary

All right, all right...maybe the holocaust thing was a bit extreme. But I’ve been good otherwise...how about putting in a good word with god about a place in heaven?
- Sincerely, Adolf

Palestinian rocket hits Tel Aviv. Middle East up in arms, and this time it has nothing to do with you. So just stay out of this – the press would try and lure you into commenting – say something irrational against contraceptives or evolution to deflect attention.
- Secretary 

Ratings at its lowest since John Paul took over – number of new members in the flock has reduced considerably over the previous quarter, while a record number has deserted our flock this quarter. Figures from Eastern Europe particularly alarming. Could we meet on this ASAP?
- God

Is it blasphemy to scribble on the holy wall?
- Anonymous

It seems that Nicholas Sarkozy, the French President, also has a Facebook profile. In fact, he has recently updated it to show us all what a normal chap he is – there are videos uploaded of Sarkozy playing with his dog, asking his wife what’s for dinner while discussing his upcoming state visit to Iraq, and so on. It would be rather interesting if our Indian politicians did the same and starting creating their own Facebook profiles. We could then have interesting situations such as Manmohan Singh throwing a sheep at Advani, Advani responding by throwing a stiletto at Manmohan and the Congress subsequently accusing Advani of being a cross-dresser. Narendra Modi’s profile would include “Genocide” among his interests. Lalu Yadav’s status message would say something along the lines of “Blew it big-time, didn’t I?” while Prakash Karat would simply have a sad smiley next to his name.

A couple of decades ago, El Salvador and Honduras went to war with each other over a football match. If you think that’s sounds like a trivial reason to go to war (even for two hot-blooded Latin American nations), then you’d be surprised at the possibilities of war that Facebook could generate. With easy access to all the big shots, there would be breaches of protocol aplenty, and some of them could possibly lead to war:

“Assistant Defence Attache Co-Secretary of France Mr Giles Portmanteau landed in a soup for addressing Prince Charles as ‘Monsieur’ as opposed to ‘His Royal Highness’. This is viewed as a major breach of protocol and has strained bilateral relations between France and the UK. Matters worsened further when Mr Portmanteau commented that the soup he landed in was quite bland like most of British cuisine, leading to a military build-up between the two countries.”
“The Middle-East is up in arms after Bill Clinton poked Queen Rania of Jordan on Facebook. While Clinton insisted that it was just a friendly gesture (with his reputation, who’s he trying to kid?), the Jordanians, for whom even touching a woman who’s not your wife results in being stoned in public (not the marijuana kind!), are demanding that Clinton be extradited immediately else it could lead to an all-out war.”

The other flip-side of this whole politicians-on-Facebook business would be that Idea Cellular will subject us to a series of ads about how this whole thing is good for democracy and you can immediately let it be known to your PM whether you think he should go for the G-20 summit or not, vote whether the Chinese state visit was a success or not, what dishes to serve the Malaysian business delegates, exploring investment possibilities in Ecuador, etc!

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Through the Lens of Destruction

A few weeks ago, I’d written about robots registering on websites. I couldn’t for the life of me imagine that these robots were created specifically for the purpose of registering on websites, and therefore hinted at the possibility of robots having developed artificial intelligence and using the same to register on various websites. However, thanks to Subarna, who surprisingly turned out to be quite an authority on this subject, it turns out that I was wrong. These robots were in fact created specifically for the purpose of registering on websites!

Naturally, this would make you question the direction in which technology seems to be headed - I mean, robots that can register on websites isn’t exactly up there with ‘man on the moon’ and the ‘television’ when it comes to scientific progress. However, it makes much more sense when viewed in light of the fact that the real purpose behind these robots registering on websites was to destroy other websites (i.e. cause them to crash) by registering en masse and bringing the system crashing down. Mankind creating robots to register on websites does not seem to make much sense, but mankind creating robots to destroy their competitors’ websites sounds perfectly plausible. The sad truth is that many of our scientific breakthroughs do not seem to make much sense until viewed through the lens of destruction.

“Hmmm...seems like a good all-terrain vehicle, but a bit extreme, I’d reckon. Yes, the roads are dangerous and accidents happen, but is this level of armour-plating really required? And what about parking? Would be a hell of a task parking it, don’t you think – particularly in cities?” This is how the Generals would’ve first reacted to the battle tank, until they were told that it wasn’t just a transport vehicle but had the capability to blow entire battalions to pieces. Similarly, Enrico Fermi and the scientist bunch were probably yelled at by the government funding agencies to ‘stop fooling around with them nuclei and do something constructive (or destructive!)’, until the government chaps were made aware of the tremendous destructive potential of nuclear reactions.  At which point it was promptly hailed as the biggest scientific breakthrough since the printing press! And yes, who can forget the person who first invented the missile. At the grand unveiling he must’ve been greeted by a wave of snickering and hushed comments about whether this was his way of compensating for something he lacked; as opposed to the feeling of awe that a missile would inspire among today’s generals.

But coming back to the robots, I was seriously impressed with this bit of information. A parallel online world where vicious wars are being fought by robots employed by companies to hack into their rivals' websites, and I didn't have a clue about it! Why didn't they have this kind of stuff in the papers, instead of the usual "Manmohan called Advani a hate-mongering mosque destroyer; Advani called him a wuss in reply" sort of headlines? Imagine - we could have cool news items like "Wipro's robot army foils the Infosys robot army's bid to hack their website in a bitter online battle. 22 robots suffered irregular shutdowns during the all-out conflict." 

And how come such stuff doesn't show up on the company balance sheets, under the expenses column: "Maintenance of robot army that acts as the protector of our website and hacks into competitor websites"? There could even be an arms race of an altogether different kind – instead of the Americans and Russians stockpiling nuclear weapons that can destroy the world a hundred times over, we could have Wipro and Infosys stockpiling the latest robots (that can destroy the online world a hundred times over) with ultra-advanced hacking and registration capabilities, and a new arms trade market can open up dealing in integrated circuits, alloy wires, etc for robots. [A quick digression – why didn’t the Americans or the Russians just stop when they had enough nuclear weapons to destroy the earth once? What’s the point of spending billions more so that you can destroy the earth TWICE over or a HUNDRED TIMES over; isn’t it the same as destroying it once?]

Now, you might think that I’m getting overly imaginative and indulging in hyperbole here – that the whole robot business will never really assume such dramatic proportions. I’m willing to bet that this was exactly the kind of complacent attitude the Americans must’ve had during the Afghan War when a bearded old Saudi billionaire approached them asking for a Stinger and expressing his desire to ‘join the cause against the commie infidels’ – and look at what’s happened now!

This is what the companies would need to guard against as far as their robots are concerned – if they start destroying schools and order their females to stay indoors, the warning signs should not go unnoticed. Turning a blind eye and adopting an attitude of “Well, as long as they’re destroying the competitor websites, we can overlook this” is just the recipe for invoking disaster upon oneself. Before you knew it, the robots would bomb coffee machines and launch suicide attacks on senior management (although many would view the latter as a positive development), and things would rapidly go downhill from there.

Except for Hollywood, which would capitalise on this money-making opportunity by coming up with a few more “Stallone/Bruce Willis/any other action hero saves the world” kind of movies where they fight the evil robots and save humanity from complete destruction!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Market Crashes Every Second Day, And Is Frankly Pretty Tired Of It!

A lot has been said about Economists generally being pessimistic, especially with the recession dominating the headlines these days. I, for one, do not believe that this is true– one of the fundamental assumptions on which the entire field of economics is based is that people always act in a rational manner. In the face of overwhelming evidence that suggests otherwise (politics, stock markets, fashion, hip-hop, Paris Hilton), Economists choose to cling on to this notion. If that is not optimistic, I don’t know what is!

Take the stock markets, for example. I can understand that the market would crash if the CEO of one of the biggest companies admits that the $100 million of profits that the company made last year, on closer inspection, turned out to be zero. The markets, however, seem to be only too willing to crash, no matter what the reason is. Every second day you would come across a headline such as -

Bloodbath on the Bourses!!!

The Sensex crashed by 730 points today as jittery investors offloaded their shares in a state of panic after it was announced that the International Astronomers Union (IAU) had revoked the planetary status of Pluto.

I can understand Pluto going hysterical when it heard of such a thing. It would’ve been happily hanging around the Kuiper Belt thinking that it was just another day in an obscenely long year, when it got that fateful call from the IAU. “Sir, can we please take 2 minutes of your time...yadda yadda yadda...really sorry about this, but you’re only a dwarf planet now...yadda yadda yadda...no no no, nothing to do with the fact that you’re a cartoon dog, I mean, c’mon, we even named a planet Uranus!” WTF???

But I fail to fathom why the investors would get jittery about an announcement such as this, or countless other such announcements. Moreover, many of these financial institutions are the same lot responsible for the subprime crisis, when they did not find anything at all suspicious when hobos turned up at their offices, barefoot and unshaven, seeking a housing loan. “Hmmm, let’s see now...It says here that your annual income is about a hundred dollars, and you’ve defaulted on every single loan you’ve taken. Looks good enough to me! Here’s your loan. Have a nice day, Sir.”

So what is it that turns these adventurous purveyors of risk, willing to throw money into ventures where the likelihood of return is about as much as Jean Claude Van Damme starring in a chick flick, into such a bundle of nerves at the stock markets? This probably explains why just about every second number in the Sensex is a psychological barrier of some sort or the other, so that you keep reading news items such as “In the euphoria over North Korea’s missile launch, the Sensex crossed the psychological 12,654-point barrier” or “For the first time in three months, the Sensex fell below the psychological 8,943-point barrier as the G-20 summit failed to decide whether the global economy is in a recession or a depression.” 

One of the few pluses of the recession, however, has been the fact that it has ensured that you always have something to talk about to total strangers, or to people whom you would otherwise be at a loss to start a conversation with. Unless you’re in Sales, there are bound to be occasions when you don’t really have anything much to say to the other person. These awkward-silence moments can now be filled up with the question “So how’s the recession affected your job/industry?” Of course, in an Indian context, there is always cricket and Bollywood to discuss, but the recession question comes in particularly handy at business meetings, where you can’t really tell a client “In conclusion, we recommend that you segment your TA...yadda yadda yadda...in order to garner greater wallet share...yadda yadda yadda...add significantly to your bottom line. So do you reckon Asin is dating Salman Khan, or do you think even Salman cannot be that stupid as to leave Katrina?”

Another plus is that the smart-alecky investment banking whiz who was your classmate is now earning only 8 times your salary instead of the earlier 10. Even this, however, might not really be the case given the latest furore over the AIG bonuses. After announcing $60 billion in losses and receiving $170 billion as bail-out from the US government, AIG decided that the time was right to award bonuses worth $165 million to its senior management. Apparently the explanation given was that these payments were necessary to retain these well-trained and highly-skilled employees. Why, of course! These are highly gifted people – you and I could not lose $60 billion in a lifetime, try as hard as we might...and here are people who can lose that sum in a year! Obviously they need to be retained!

As a consolation, these companies could then send out letters to their stakeholders “You may have read reports in the media about your hard-earned money being squandered away in risky ventures by greedy, foolhardy and amoral executives. We would like to assure you that this is furthest from the truth. You hard-earned money has in fact been squandered by well-trained, highly-qualified professionals with degrees from top management and finance institutes.”

Remember, though – the next time you think that bringing an economy crashing down is not exactly your cup of tea, all you need to do is saunter in to the stock exchange, pick out a jittery(any) investor and whisper into his ear “Did you hear about the Finance Secretary being embroiled in a sex scandal? News is that he’s planning to hike the prime lending rate by 2% to deflect attention from the scandal.”

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

The Adam Sandler Syndrome

Sometime last year, Adam Sandler acted in a movie called Reign Over Me. This is a story about grief, family, healing, male friendship, mental health, and the meaning of love. WTF? Adam Sandler??? Yes, that was exactly my reaction when I heard about this. Over the years, we have seen Adam Sandler in a wide variety of inane comedies and can recognise an Adam Sandler movie even if we see it for half a minute and Adam Sandler is not in the scene. For instance, the following are perfectly valid scenarios for an Adam Sandler movie:

·         Adam Sandler falls in love with a woman. It then turns out that she is actually a salmon. This, however, does not deter Adam Sandler. In the beginning a lot of funny stuff happens, then sad stuff happens and it looks like all is lost, but Piscean love finally prevails in a typically romantic-comedy ending.

·         Adam Sandler is heir to a billion-dollar empire, which scares his dad for obvious reasons (would you trust Adam Sandler with your billions?). So Adam Sandler has to prove himself. So he sets up a competition with the evil management-type guy who wants his money – they have to race against electric eels in a gigantic aquarium. Expectedly the evil management-type guy employs all methods of devious trickery to cheat his way to victory, but ends up losing.

·         Adam Sandler is a good-hearted chap but has the IQ of a turnip. So the cruel world is quick to take advantage of this fact and everyone generally picks on him. Only his mother supports him through thick and thin, but mainly because she’s a bit thick. Some sort of disaster strikes the town and somehow Adam Sandler contrives to make himself the town saviour in his inimitable, comically-inept manner. The town siren falls for him in the middle of it all and they live happily ever after.

The following, however, are NOT scenarios you would associate with an Adam Sandler movie:

·         Set in the Iron Curtain in the 50s, Adam Sandler is an American diplomat whose daughter has been kidnapped by KGB agents. In a gripping saga of cold war intrigue, politics and back-stabbing, Adam Sandler does not know whom to trust as he goes about trying to negotiate the release of his daughter.

·         In this emotionally-charged movie about finding oneself and having the courage to stand up for it, Adam Sandler brings to screen the powerful persona of gay rights activist William Scott Fitzgerald. From his traumatic childhood to facing the hostility of narrow-minded adults, Adam Sandler puts in a powerhouse performance as he battles for the rights of his people.

·         In this adaptation of the classic Jane Austen novel, Adam Sandler brings to life the role of the nobleman Edward Pigeonhole, who resides in his big country home in Gloucestershire, takes an hour to dress up in his fancy nobleman clothes, plays bridge all the time and says things like “Why, Miss Pennyworth! I fear that you have misread my intentions. Indeed, I must make it clear that I’m perfectly happy being betrothed to Miss Elizabeth.”

So it came as no surprise that people did not really take Adam Sandler seriously in the movie Reign Over Me, even though some critics proclaimed that it was a gritty portrayal that captured the trauma of loss and longing. The sad fact simply is that no one can EVER takes Adam Sandler seriously. This is often referred to as the Adam Sandler Syndrome, and it occurs when people stop taking something seriously. I shall now proceed to cite some more examples of situations where the Adam Sandler syndrome has struck.

Car Awards

Invariably, as soon as a new car is launched in the Indian market, it already seems to have won a host of awards. The launch ads always have proclamations such as “Voted Car of the Year, 2009 - AutoCar”, “Best B-Segment Car, 2009 – Overdrive” and “Best Manual Gearbox - B-Segment Cars, 2009 – Motor India”. Either there are too many awards being handed out, or too many car magazines being sponsored by car manufacturers. I cannot think of a single car launched recently that had not already won a clutch of awards, even though it is just getting launched. Hence no one takes these awards seriously anymore, they’re like Adam Sandler.

Film Awards

The same goes for film awards. There was once a time when film awards meant something, and only when you really won something worthwhile such as “SEVEN Academy Award Nominations” would you put it up on the DVD cover. Today, every second DVD you pick up would have a bunch of awards listed on top - “Runner-up, Sundance Film Festival”, “Winner, Best Motion Picture (Drama), Teheran Film Festival”, “Silver Balloon, Foreign Film Category, Festival D’Or, Cannes” and so on. I’m sure even an Adam Sandler movie must’ve picked up an award; no wonder people don’t take it seriously any longer!

When someone is travelling and gives a time estimate

This has happened to most of us at one point or another; and at times we’ve resorted to it ourselves. Say you have to meet a friend at 2. It’s 2.15 and there’s still no sign of that person, so you give them a call. Even though you can hear the tap running in the background and know that the friend has still not left home, they’ll tell you “Yea yea, I’m on my way. Almost there, will reach in ten minutes.” Or they’ll say they’re mid-way when they’ve just left home, and you can’t even make out because the traffic sounds the same everywhere. Like the way one would treat Adam Sandler, I’ve stopped taking these time estimates seriously.

Swipe In/Swipe Out

This is a novel method that, by most accounts, seems to have its origins in the IT industry. It allows employees the luxury of officially being in office without actually being physically present. For instance, an employee going for a morning jog can go and swipe in, and then continue with his jog, go home, have breakfast and freshen up, while the records show that he’s been in office the whole time. Again, if an employee feels like going shopping or for a movie while also being in the office at the same time, he can go out, come back and then swipe out in the evening. No one takes it seriously anymore, although in the early years carrying the swipe card around was a cool thing because it meant that you were working in a modern, new-age company. Now it’s suffering from the Adam Sandler Syndrome – nobody takes it seriously anymore.

Book Praises on the Back-Cover

“A thoroughly entertaining and magnificently written book – reminds me of Calvino in his prime!” – The New York Herald

“Brilliant. Inspired. Once you read this book, you won’t look at the world through the same eyes!” – The Washington Post

“His best work yet – enthralling, engrossing and mysterious in equal measure.” – The New Era Sun Times Herald Post

Every book that you pick up these days tends to have these kinds of sentences screaming at you. I know it’s the sales copy section and you’re supposed to lure the buyer into purchasing this book, but overdoing it has meant that people just do not care anymore as the Adam Sandler Syndrome kicks in.

I’m quite sure there are many more such cases wherein the Adam Sandler Syndrome has kicked in or is at the risk of kicking in. I invite all of you to chip in with your examples, if any. Each valid example would fetch that person a bunch of bonus points. Of course, in the spirit of things, the bonus points are a joke, like Adam Sandler!

Friday, April 10, 2009

Politics, Careers and The Lord!

There are people and companies that make a living by forecasting fads and advising their clients on how to exploit the fad and make money out of it. However, I’m quite sure that none of these companies would have seen the whole shoe-hurling fad coming. I don’t suppose ‘Trend Forecasters Founded by People Who Always Claim to Have Correctly Predicted Events AFTER They Happen’ Inc would’ve made a presentation to Nike saying “Over the next few months, hurling shoes at politicians would be the in-thing. People all over the world would be indulging in it, so perhaps you could market a special line of shoes that have been tested for target practice at firing ranges, in order to ensure maximum accuracy while hurling.”

What’s interesting to note, though, is the contrasting ways in which the shoes were hurled, and the reactions to the same, which probably give a good indication of the respective cultures of the countries where the incident occurred. To illustrate this point, let us consider the first case in Iraq and the latest Indian case.

In the Iraqi case, even though the journalist was a good 20-30 feet away from the target, he still fancied his chances and HURLED the shoe with all his might. Only an unexpectedly agile Bush ensured that the journalist missed his target. In footballing terms, this would be equivalent to someone unleashing a fierce thirty-yard shot from outside the penalty area, forcing the goalkeeper into a save at full-stretch. In the Indian case, the journalist was sitting BARELY 2 metres from his target. Yet, all he could manage was a gentle, UNDERARM (yes, he actually threw the shoe underarm, if you see the footage!) throw which harmlessly floated past the target. While doing this, he mumbled “I protest.”  This is like a striker having an open goal at his mercy from 2 yards out, but he doesn’t even force the goalkeeper into a save, instead side-footing the ball gently beyond the post.

In Iraq, the journalist was immediately pounced upon by security, bundled to the ground, handcuffed and dragged away. Apparently he was even tortured while in prison. If it was the Taliban, he probably would’ve been whipped or stoned in public. If it was any other country, he would’ve at least been detained for a while. In the US he would’ve even been forced to appear on talk shows. In India, however, the journalist was ‘forgiven’ and offered cash rewards and a ticket to contest for Parliament! In fact, even while he was escorted out, security was instructed to be ‘gentle’. Talk about being hospitable and forgiving!

Apart from politics, though, there have been a lot of profound and fundamental questions that I’ve been grappling with: does God exist; what is the point of our existence; and what happens if you’re seeing a guy called Jesus. Apparently Madonna is seeing this chap called Jesus; I wonder if that would earn her some brownie points with God. You know, when she’s up there at the pearly gates and St Peter tells her that he didn’t particularly care for “Papa Don’t Preach” and asks her to give some justification as to why she should be allowed into heaven, she can always say “Look, I loved Jesus, honest! I let Jesus into my life.”

It turns out that the goalkeeper of the Spanish hockey team is also named Jesus. This raises interesting possibilities – the Bible always tells you that Jesus Saves. But in this case, that could well change to Jesus saves, but the rebound fell to an opponent striker and he scored. And what happens to his teammates, when Jesus allows an easy goal? Do they still tell him “F%#k you, Jesus!”?

Since I don’t have any more Jesus jokes, I shall now move on to the more serious topic of jobs. It’s fascinating how the profession you’re in has such a great effect on the way you speak. An MBA would try and use words like synergy and out-of-the-box thinking in most of their sentences. A hip-hop artiste would say things like “Ahm goann’ whip yo’ ass”. A politician would use the sentences “But how does this help the poor?” and “We shall stand united against the forces of communalism” in each and every argument.  A call centre employee would always tell you “We’ll look into it, Sir. It’ll take five working days to address your complaint”. A sales person would always be extra-friendly and act like your best friend and tell you things like “Between the two of us...” or “I don’t do this with any of my other customers, but because it’s you...”

But what I don’t get is why commercial pilots speak the way they do. It’s not as if they’re a VJ or a boxing match announcer or a vegetable seller that they need to speak in a particular way. Yet all commercial pilots always speak in that same tone “Uhhh...welcome to Kingfisher Airlines. Uhhh...umm...the weather today is mostly clear skies. We uhhh...ummm...shall be flying at a height of 35,000 feet above sea level. Ummm...there might be a bit of turbulence during the flight....but, ahhh...umm...my crew is there in case you require any...uhh...assistance. On behalf of my co-pilot and ummm...crew, this is ahhh...umm...your captain wishing you all a...uhhh...pleasant flight. Thank you.” Do they actually talk like that even when they’re not on the job? “Honey, I uhhh...ummm...prepared breakfast for you today. You might...ahh..umm...want to steer clear of the kitchen for a while. Also...ahh...we’re out of eggs and milk...so...umm...I ordered some from the nearby store.”

Perhaps instead of having career aptitude tests and career counselling sessions, schools should just look at the way students speak and decide what job would be right for them; this would greatly simplify matters -

Always talks about the sad and dark aspects of life? Poet (Or Economist)

Extra-friendly and talkative (and has just convinced you sell your car and invest the proceeds in the Nicaraguan bonds market)? Sales (Or Management)

Always uses ahhh, ummm...and generally pauses a lot while speaking? Commercial Pilot (Or Management)

Keeps using phrases like “I know exactly what you mean?” Psychologist (Or Management – HR)

Always pretends to understand what you’ve told them without having a clue? Customer Service (Or Management)

Never answers your question but instead gives a totally irrelevant and long answer hoping that it would deter you from asking further questions? Politician (Or Management)

Can always lie to you while giving you the impression of complete honesty? Lawyer (Or Management)

From the above list, it’s pretty clear that just about anyone can get into management, as long as you’re willing to make your negative traits a basis for a career.