Most people assume that the
government is excellent at corruption, very good at digging up roads and
terrible at everything else – but this is only part of the picture. We may
curse the government each time we pass by a road that has been dug up for the
last 6 months, but the reality is that a dug up road is like a new year’s
resolution gone wrong. It’s like the gym that you’ve stopped going to a month
into the new year, the cakes that you’ve started eating after a fortnight of
conscientious abstinence and the pair of jogging shoes that you used precisely
twice and that’s now making you avoid the shoe rack in fear of being consumed
by an overwhelming sense of guilt.
You know how it is. Each
New Year begins with a significant proportion of the population making a
resolution to make their neighborhood gyms richer. Well, alright…the resolution
is to lose weight and get fit in the New Year, but the reality is it’s the gyms
that get richer. To their credit, though, the people at least tried. It’s the
same with the government – a dug up road is like the government ebulliently
committing to a new infrastructure project, beginning work with fresh-faced
enthusiasm and promptly losing interest midway through. Which is why the road
remains dug up until the next time an election is round the corner.
So while most people were
cheering the government’s announcement that it’ll allocate several thousands of
crores for infrastructure investment in Bangalore at the Global Investors’ Meet
last week, I wasn’t quite so enthusiastic. It just meant that there would be
many more roads dug up all over the city before promptly being forgotten in the
eager rush to do some fresh digging up.
For those of you wondering,
the Global Investors’ Meet is one of those annual shindigs that are
increasingly popular in India these days. It’s the sort of event that gets the
newspapers frothing in excitement because it includes high ranking politicians
as well as corporate leaders who are so senior that they cannot afford to be
seen doing any actual work and hence spend all their time networking. It’s one
of those events that most governments can fall back on to bail them out of a
crisis situation and buy them a few weeks of goodwill. “Rising racial
intolerance? Collapsing infrastructure? Power crisis looming? Let’s have a
Global Investors’ Meet before this gets out of hand!”
A big sign of the success
of any of these Global Investors’ Meets is the value of the MoU’s signed at the
meet. And you know it’s always a spectacular success because every year it’s a
new record number that ushers in a sense of unmitigated optimism for the state
in question. The newspapers eagerly lap this up with reports stating that “Investors signed MoU’s worth Rs 60,000 crores with the Karnataka
Government which could lead to the creation of up to 6 lakh jobs in the state. To
address industry concerns about excessive paperwork that scuppers most
investments, the state government has promised that it would hire origami
enthusiasts to make all that paperwork a lot more interesting. Ratan Tata has
also praised Karnataka claiming that it’s one of the few states that he
actually enjoys investing in, while Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, who had twice
threatened to leave Karnataka, has once again changed her mind and decided to
stick around and invest some more.”
Each year, everyone goes
back thinking that the state is well and truly on the way to being an oasis of
development and prosperity, only to come back for the next Global Investors’
Meet with everything still being the same. Any reasonable person would be well
within his rights to wonder why this is so. The chief culprit for this is the
MoU. In essence, an MoU is like a non-committal, no-strings-attached version of
the IoU. While it officially stands for Memorandum of Understanding, it's meaning is closer to “Might Owe You”. According to its definition, MoUs are “not legally
binding but they carry a degree of seriousness and mutual respect, stronger
than a gentlemen's agreement”. I’m no Sherlock, but that does sound very
suspicious, doesn’t it? Even if an MoU carries the highest degree of
seriousness and respect, it still means that a company may invest a certain
amount in a state, but it just as well might not do so if it doesn’t feel like
it. So you’ll have legal teams as well as government and corporate big shots
spend months and months agonising over the fine print and meticulously poring over the details of a document that finally looks something like this:
In short, major investment
decisions that could impact the future of a state are made on documents that
hold less legal water than your average rental agreement. Which means that
you’re more likely to get your rental deposit back than the Global Investors’
meet resulting in any actual investment – now that’s a headline worth reading!
3 comments:
You should write for ET. :P
Sure! Ask them to have me on board as a guest columnist :)
I feel so out of touch here, had no idea they even had those meetings, sounds like a huge wastage of time though not having anything concrete in there. Ridiculous!
Post a Comment